I spent my life working for the government at first and then
a Crown Corporation which is in effect the same thing. The only difference is
that the government of the day could be seen to get out of competing directly
with private enterprise. Personally, I don’t see the problem as long as the
government runs on an adequately funded, well run and forward thinking business
model. Oh…I see the problem now.
Part of the complaint against government run businesses is
that they don’t have to be efficient because if they run out of money the
government will back them financially. To some extent this is a true statement,
but surprisingly it doesn’t happen as often as you are led to believe. For the
most part Crown Corporations perform very well. No, they generally don’t do as
well as their private competitors, but they have a different set of
circumstances they have to adhere to.
The government has a mandate to perform certain services for
the general population and guarantee that the electors will benefit. It is
staffed for the most part by union workers or members of some association and
they are protected from losing their job because some boss decides on a whim to
let them go. Just as the jobs expectations are clearly spelled out in the
contract, so too are the responsibilities of the employer to that worker. It is
a symbiotic relationship with each side feeling they got the worse of the
bargain. That is as it should be.
Private enterprise also provides services, but for them it
is profit that drives the corporate engine. They don’t have to worry about
voters but rather investors are who they need to keep happy. To do that they
continually look for ways to shave down operating costs. The easiest and
fastest way to save money is to trim the labour force or certainly to cut down
on their benefits. Often, the jobs in these places are fun and the work can be
exciting. The pay is competitive and why worry about benefits and pensions, you
are young and healthy.
The problem occurs when things don’t go as planned and you
get sick or God forbid you start to age. Most companies understand if you are
sick, well, for a while anyways. The bottom line is that if you are too ill to
do the job then they can’t afford to keep you on salary. Up until the 70’s in Canada ,
a woman would keep being pregnant a secret for as long as possible so that they
wouldn’t lose their job. Luckily, the government has passed laws that ordain
companies must keep the woman’s position open for one year so that she might
begin to raise her child without fear of being unemployed.
Some companies that are less than desirable places to work
will keep the job open (they have to) and welcome the new mother back. Well,
until an acceptable time passes and then they will lay off that mother. We all
know that new moms take too much time off from work and it is a better than
even bet she will be pregnant again within a year or two causing more
difficulties at work. We all understand what scum bags do this.
Unfortunately, there is little or no recourse. Even if you
did have a valid case against the company, it would cost too much in legal fees
to fight the termination and would you really want to work for a company that
treats the employees like that?
NO! It is far better to count your blessings and start
looking for some place to work that values intelligence and hard work.
No comments:
Post a Comment